November 16, 2011

Health care case before Supreme Court tests federal limits

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to the 2010 health care overhaul law, President Obama’s signature legislative achievement, setting the stage for oral arguments by March and a decision in late June as the 2012 presidential campaign enters its crucial final months. 
The decision to hear the case prompted confident assertions from each side that it was sure to prevail and gave rise to calculations about the complicated political impact of possible rulings.
The range of issues the court agreed to address amounted to a menu of possible resolutions: The justices could uphold the law, strike down just its most controversial provision or some or all of the rest of it, or duck a definitive decision entirely as premature.
Whatever the outcome, there is no question that the tensions running through the case — among the 26 states challenging the law and the federal government, and between Obama and the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Roberts — are likely to give rise to both a political and constitutional blockbuster.
The court’s decision to step in had been expected, but Monday’s order answered many questions about just how the case would proceed. Indeed, it offered a roadmap toward a ruling that will help define the legacy of the Roberts court while focusing renewed political attention on the law that has sharply divided Republicans and Democrats.
The court scheduled 5 1/2 hours of arguments instead of the usual one, a testament to the importance of the case, and the court’s ruling a few months later will present opportunities and challenges for the presidential contenders as well as for candidates in the battle for control of Congress.
It is hardly clear, for instance, that a Supreme Court ruling upholding the law would help only Obama, as opponents of the law might redouble their efforts to elect candidates committed to repealing it. And a decision striking down the law might allow Obama to court voters unhappy with the Supreme Court’s decisions as he did in cases like Citizens United, which allowed unlimited campaign spending from corporations and unions.
Appeals from three courts had been vying for the justices’ attention, presenting an array of issues beyond the central one of whether Congress has the constitutional power to require people to purchase health insurance or face a penalty through the so-called individual mandate.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear appeals from just one decision — from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Atlanta — the only one so far striking down the mandate. The decision, from a divided three-judge panel, said the mandate overstepped congressional authority and could not be justified by the constitutional power “to regulate commerce” or “to lay and collect taxes.” The appeals court went no further, though, severing the mandate from the rest of the law.
On Monday, the justices agreed to decide not only whether the mandate is constitutional but also, if it is not, how much of the balance of the law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, must fall along with it.
But even the Obama administration has said that the mandate is “absolutely intertwined” with two other provisions — one forbidding insurers to turn away applicants, and the other barring them from taking account of pre-existing conditions.
In a statement issued soon after the decision, the administration reaffirmed its position that the Constitution permitted Congress to enact the mandate.
“We know the Affordable Care Act is constitutional and are confident the Supreme Court will agree,” said Dan Pfeiffer, the White House communications director.
Pam Bondi, Florida’s attorney general, said she welcomed the court’s prompt action in agreeing to review the 11th Circuit’s decision, in which her state was the lead plaintiff.
“Throughout this case,” Bondi said, “we have urged swift judicial resolution because of the unprecedented threat that the individual mandate poses to the liberty of Americans simply because they live in this country.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, said that a decision upholding the law would mean that “Americans will benefit from lower health care costs and greater access to high-quality medical care.”
But leading opponents of the law said they were confident they would triumph. “It is high time for the high court to strike down this unconstitutional, unworkable and unpopular law,” said Randy Barnett, a law professor at Georgetown.
The 11th Circuit did rule against Florida and the other states on one of their other central arguments, rejecting a challenge to the law’s expansion of the Medicaid program.
The Supreme Court also agreed to hear an appeal from that ruling.

The states, represented by Paul D. Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general, argued that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority by expanding the eligibility and coverage thresholds that states must adopt to remain eligible to participate in Medicaid.
The problem, Clement wrote, was that “Congress did not tie its new conditions only to those additional federal funds made newly available under” the Affordable Care Act. “It instead made the new terms a condition of continued participation in Medicaid, thereby threatening each State with the loss of all federal Medicaid funds — on average, more than a billion dollars per year — unless it adopts the act’s substantial expansions of state obligations.”
The justices also said they would consider an intriguing threshold issue that could conceivably postpone any definitive ruling on the mandate until 2015. In September, a divided three-judge panel of the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Richmond, Va., ruled that it was premature to decide the case in light of the Anti-Injunction Act, a federal law that bars suits “for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax.” The Supreme Court had interpreted the term “tax” very broadly for purposes of the law.
If the Fourth Circuit ruling is correct, individuals may not challenge the individual mandate until the first penalty is due in April 2015.
In all, the Supreme Court agreed to hear three appeals, two from challengers to the law and a third from the Obama administration.
There was no indication in Monday’s order that any of the justices had decided to disqualify themselves from the case.






read full article

related content

Health care law to fund “innovation” jobs program
Last update: Monday November 14, 2011 – 11:24 AM

The Obama administration is tapping the health care overhaul law to advance its economic agenda, a political priority for the White House.
more from home

Want to sit up front? Be ready to pay up front
Marine commandant: End of gay ban a non-event
Shoppers grab Cyber Mon. deals

 resize text
buy reprints
















Paul Douglas

Intermittent Clouds
 Metro traffic

Most read
Most Emailed
Most Commented

DFL label on Romney: A flip-flopper
Woman alleges 13-year affair with Cain; he denies wrongdoing
Mbakwe out for season: Torn ACL
St. Paul mom: I stole from burned son
Ex-Vikings QB Kapp fights rival at Canadian football banquet (with video)
Anoka student dies after playing basketball at YMCA
State employees’ sick day payout outdated
Shoppers grab Cyber Mon. deals












calendar of events

Mon 28
Tue 29
Wed 30
Thu 01
Fri 02
Sat 03
Sun 04

Leo Kottke
The Fling and Yukon…
Polarities: Black and…
Brandi Carlile – SOLD OUT
VNV Nation and Straftanz
Spyro Gyra
A Civil War Christmas

Search by category

ChooseMusicMoviesDiningOn StageArtTV ListingsFamily Events


Tell us about an event
Tell us about a venue
<a href=”” ><img src=”” border=”0″ alt=””></a>



question of the day

Poll: How far have you gotten with holiday shopping?


I’m done.
Nice headway, but a ways to go.
Just getting started.
Haven’t even thought about it yet.
View results

Offers & Events



Rollover and Check Out Today’s Steal!
Click Here





Gopher Baylor Barn Buster $10
Cheer on Gopher Women’s Basketball Sun Dec 4, 1pm. Barn Buster incl $5 food
Buy Tickets!





Black Friday Hourly Specials Start 11/25!




subscription offer

eEdition for just $1.99/week

Get an exact replica of the Star Tribune e-mailed to you. Full story







Software Developer
Wand Corporation

Leadership Associate – Business Interiors
Room & Board

Web Producer
Twin Cities Public Television (tpt)

Pharmacist – Two Positions Availible
Lake Region Healthcare

Entry-Level Technology Services Technician

Graphic Designer
StarTribune Advertiser

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Marine Credit Union

Service Manager
Corwin Automotive

Parts Manager
Corwin Automotive

Multiple Positions
Remmele Engineering Inc

Director of Finance
Willmar Municipal Utilities

Mental Health Professional
Blue Earth County
Search All Jobs


inside the StarTribune


Star Tribune offers digital subscriptions


‘Guess the Snowfall’ is back this winter


Holiday gift guide 2011


Out There: Videos and news of the unusual


Minnesota giving: A special section


Download new iPhone, Android news apps

<a href=”” ><img src=”” border=”0″ alt=””></a>


425 Portland Av. S.

Minneapolis, MN 55488

(612) 673-4000

CompanyAbout the StarTribune
Directory + Contacts
Jobs at the StarTribune
Newspaper in Education Entertainment

Subscriber ServicesNewspaper Subscriptions
Manage Account

WebsiteTerms of Use
Privacy Policy
Ad Choices
Site Index

Buy AdsOnline Ads
Newspaper Ads

Article Archives
Back copies
Commercial Reprints
Connect with UsContact Us
Become a Fan
Follow Us


© 2011 StarTribune. All rights reserved. is powered by Limelight Networks

Newspaper Subscriptions